Two Interconnected Expanded Core Curriculum Areas for Children with CVI

As a Teacher of Student with Visual Impairments, I am certainly focused on the improvement of visual skills for my students with CVI. I am also interested in how my students understand everything that is easily understood by their sighted peers due to their incidental learning. These intertwined Expanded Core Curriculum (ECC) areas must be considered for that equal access.

These two important areas of the Expanded Core Curriculum must be considered separately and together. These are:

1. Sensory efficiency skills
2. Compensatory Skills, Functional Academic Skills (Including Communication Modes)

Sensory Efficiency Skills: This area is especially important for the child with CVI but in a totally different way than that considered for a child with ocular impairments. We are expecting improvement for student with CVI. Functional visual assessment provides the baseline for functional visual skills and sets the stage for this improvement using strategies and objectives matched to the assessed needs.

Compensatory Skills, Functional Academic Skills: This area must be considered to support the building functional vision of the student with CVI. Vision is the distance sense that supports what is heard, smelled, felt and tasted.

Think about a classroom where someone drops something. The child with typical visual abilities can turn, look and determine what made the sound and determine that the sound is not a threat. The student with CVI hears the item drop and due to lack of visual location abilities or lack of distance abilities, does not turn, does not understand what made the sound and might remain in a state of stress wondering if this sound is a threat or not. We need to build this understanding of environmental sounds by labeling the sound, bringing the child closer to the sound, bringing the sound to them and allowing them to make the sound themselves for complete understanding. If someone drops a tray in the classroom, I make sure to bring a tray to the child and allow them to see it, feel it and push it off the tray to create the sound. Once understood, the sound will not create stress and allow the child to return to the learning. This approach provides the student with the same access to the visual, auditory, tactile, cognitive/language information enjoyed by their sighted peers.

For functional academics, focus needs to consistently be on ways to create and foster the highest level of independence possible to live and work in the future. These are skills that should be worked on from birth! Think of the value of organizational skills for a child with limited visual abilities. Getting objects from a storage place and returning the item to that store place when completed builds independence and understanding of the student’s environment.

For communication the CVI assessment can help us determine whether we provide tactile sign language to the student with deafblindness or just visually presented sign. If the child is only using peripheral vision, they could never see and understand the small, distinct visual-only sign that requires central vision use. If a communication device is used, the CVI assessment provides information about the accessibility of pictures, the ability to recognize pictures, the number of items that can be seen and recognized at one time (complexity of array), and what size is needed (due to complexity not acuity!). For literacy and communication, the CVI assessment provides information about the unique need for color highlighting, spacing and print size (due to complexity not acuity!)

All students with visual impairments need the ECC considered and provided in their educational programming. Students with CVI have the same educational needs but with consideration that CVI is completely different from ocular impairments.

What Do iPads Do to Support Students

As discussed many, many times, the strategies for CVI must match the assessment results. We never can just randomly apply a strategy because it will not fit the functional visual needs of the child. If it does not fit the functional visual needs, it will not provide visual access and will not foster improvement of cognitive and visual skills.

With that reminder, I was asked about ideas for iPad apps for children who struggle with visual recognition. Just providing a student with an iPad does not guarantee access. We need to assess the child, think about their visual needs and carefully use the iPad as a tool to provide that access.

What can be some general needs for students who struggle with visual recognition?

Impact of Color: The student might benefit from color highlighting to draw visual attention to specific areas on 3D and 2D materials. That color supports visual attention to the specific place.

Light: Backlighting can helps foster access to materials especially in 2D (pictures and text). Some children do not benefit from backlighting and this should be part of the assessment.

Visual Processing Time: There is still a need for increased time for full visual exploration and full visual understanding.

Visual Field: Lower visual fields might be affected in some children. Other children struggle with visual attention in all fields or “hyper attention” if the scene is too complex. (attends to just one part not taking in the whole scene).

Visual Recognition: Presenting new materials in new kinds of presentations might require the verbal narration of visual attributes.

Clutter: Clutter can affects visual understanding of objects, increased display clutter, of faces, and of the sensory environment.

Distance: Near information is more accessible. Distance curiosity is not typical so distance information is missed.

How do we want the iPad to support the student? 

Impact of Color:

• Tools for color highlighting help support salient feature discussion in pictures and text.

Light:

• Backlighting helps with understanding and easy of access to prevent fatigue.
• Moving to 2D: taking pictures of their items in the environment and then providing the 2D on the backlighted iPad.

Visual Processing Time:

• Provides ability to capture images and videos for longer visual access time.
• Capturing images can be reviewed as long as needed.

Visual Field:

• iPad placement is flexible matched to child’s best visual field.

Visual Recognition:

• Expanded understanding: Example: Here is one kind of mouse in the book but these are all the other kinds of mice.

Visual Clutter and Access:

• Enlargement: for things at distance, for small items in complexity and for literacy
• Overall ability to use settings and apps to reduce complexity of images.
• Studying facial expression in photographs and videos: salient language of faces matched to voice (auditory). There can be instruction about facial expressions that match the auditory information.
• Visual attributes of items in photographs and as part of texts.
• Increasing spacing of words and sentences to reduce clutter.
• Masking: clutter reduction with tools in Photos.

Distance:

• Videos on the iPad: to bring information about events and concepts that occur at distance: Example: We are reading about giraffes. I think about providing a child with access to where that animal might live and how they move.
• Access to distance classroom events: Examples: learning song hand movements for circle time.
• Community access: taking photographs of signs and environmental materials that can be explored on the backlighted, near placed iPad.

Supporting Understanding of the Auditory Environment

Children with CVI have difficulty seeing things at distance. They tend to be “close lookers”.  If they do look to distance events, they struggle to understand what they see. Interestingly, when children do begin to look for sounds sources, they tend only search for familiar sounds from visually familiar materials. They don’t seem to even try to look for the sources of unfamiliar sounds from visually unfamiliar materials.
In learning environments at home, in the community and at school, students are surrounded by sounds. Students with typical vision hear a sound, turn to look for the sound source and determine whether there is a threat in their environment. They alert, find the sound source and return to activities, regaining attention to learning.
Because children with CVI lack this ability to checkout the sound, to checkout whether there is a threat or not, we need to carefully support and build that environmental sound understanding. Only then can they return to learning. We want to connect their visual and auditory understanding of their distance environment through planned exploration at near.
This is a statement I include in all my IEPs under methodologies:

“Support Susan’s understanding of environmental sounds by bringing sound sources to her, by traveling to the sounds to explore them and by interacting directly at near with the items that are making sounds. Allow Susan to make the sound if possible to connect the visual information to the auditory event”.
Example: If the door slamming made the noise, have the child slam the door themselves. Verbally label the object, the door, and the action, slamming. Later when slamming door happens, it can be identified and labeled.